What Nobody Proved About Austin

This piece in the Texas Monthly has been making the social media circles.  It argues that – surprise! – Austin might be the state’s most segregated city. It’s so Slate-y in its counter-intuitive hypothesis, that I could just not resist reading it.

The article features a devastating collection of data-driven comparisons of Austin census tracts with other major Texas cities to persuasively evidence the hypothesis.  Well, actually, the piece does no such thing.  Instead, it is a collection of anecdotal observations by the author.  Me pointing out that the supermarket I frequent on the west side has a non-zero Latino and Asian presence or that there were plenty of white people living on East Riverside with me back-in-the-day carries as much empirical heft as this piece.  Which is to say none at all.

There is no evidence presented whatsoever to support the conjecture that Austin is the state’s most segregated city.  Perhaps it is! It would be valuable if somebody given column inches in Texas Monthly would look at the data to figure it out.

The weirdest part is the tangential detour into geographic districts.  I was a proponent of a switch to SMDs, but I have no idea how we get from SMDs to desegregation.  The author eventually admits as much:

But whether single-member districts are fully the answer remains to be seen. African Americans face a special challenge: they have been moving out of Austin entirely, making it harder to carve out an electoral district that will guarantee their representation. A different problem affects Asian Americans, who now make up 6 percent of residents. Not suffering the same segregationist legacies as blacks and Latinos, they are more spread out across the city, making it difficult to guarantee direct representation. As for Latinos, when the plan goes into effect in 2014, they will probably net one or two more seats.

So Latino representation might go up 4% or 14%, but clearly not be a voting majority. African-American representation might cease. And Asian-American representation will be unlikely.  So given this data, geographic diversity leading to desegregation happens how exactly?

It is uncertain what kind of segregation the author is actually focused on reducing.  I assume a combination of residential housing and workplace segregation.  There are all kinds of progressive policies – funding geographically-dispersed affordable housing, supporting living wages, investing in K-12 and community colleges, funding anti-discrimination law enforcement and so on – that can actually do something about segregation.  Cheering on young women wearing quinceañera gowns into the Oasis (which I am all for!) is not a meaningful or scalable solution to housing or workplace segregation.

Even if Austin is not the most segregated city in Texas, plenty of Austinites of all shapes and colors are quite concerned about residential segregation and the educational attainment of the emerging Austin Latino majority. We talk and even blog about it and our need to do more! It would be valuable if folks given space in Texas Monthly would advance actual policies to deal with these issues.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Development, Economics, Housing. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to What Nobody Proved About Austin

  1. The writer that put this piece together for Texas Monthly is just a racist that’s inciting their own hate, and what they’re saying is, “Austin whites don’t include blacks and latinos in business, culture, and other activities”.

    It’s a baseless straw-man argument they’re making and I find it offensive.

  2. Julio Gonzalez Altamirano says:

    I didn’t find the piece hateful or offensive; the author is not represent contemporary white Austinites as taking pro-active action to be exclusive. Rather, she identified past policies that generated segregation and attacked a climate of conformity ensconced by Austin’s mild multiculturalism. In my view, housing and workplace segregation still exists today (i.e. ethnic groups are not proportionately distributed across neighborhoods or industries). I identified some policies already that can help. My frustration with the author is that she made a big claim but did not assemble the evidence to prove it; further, she did not identify any practical or scalable solutions to the social ill she identified. It was a missed opportunity.

  3. Jessica says:

    Everybody knows that the place to take your quince photo is at the Capitol and not the Oasis on a waterless Lake Travis. Why would anyone want to schlep all the way out there Anyway?

  4. Pingback: The Blogosphere Discusses Segregation in Austin | Texas housers

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s